Fast Chess

Edward Winter

fast lightning chess

CHESS, May 1940, page 193

Vladislav Tkachiev (Moscow) is looking into the history of blitz chess and seeks information (including game-scores) pertaining to a number of rapid-play events, up to and including recent times. He also raises some general questions, such as when ‘blitz’ was first used to describe five-minute chess.

The earliest instance of the term ‘lightning chess’ that we recollect is on page 105 of the March 1897 BCM:

‘What may not unfittingly be called “lightning chess” has been introduced at the Sydenham and Forrest Hills Club. Tournaments are organised on the principle of rapid play, 30 seconds per move being allowed, and half-an-hour for the entire game. Much interest is being evoked by this novel mode of play.’


As noted on page 71 of A Chess Omnibus, the following year (February 1898 issue, page 75), the BCM expressed an uncompromising view:

‘Continuous tournaments, and rapid games of one minute per move, have been lately in great favour in America. They have not yet caught on much in Europe, and we hope the latter kind never will do so, for though they may be very amusing, and may promote a quick sight of the board, they are more of the nature of skittles than of solid and thoughtful chess, and we should think would be a very poor preparation for contests of any real importance.’

The same page of our book also added that the Hereford Times of 22 June 1895 referred to ‘Bird and Burn playing lightning chess’.

See Earliest Occurrences of Chess Terms for an 1873 specimen of the term lightning chess. The game in question, Belden v Gilberg, lasted seven minutes and was given in C.N. 4886. Our ‘Earliest Occurrences’ feature article also cites the first use of the term ‘blitz’ that we have found so far (dating from 1942).

C.N. 1050 (see pages 9-10 of Chess Explorations) gave two endings to quick games: Alekhine v Tartakower, Carlsbad, 8 May 1923 and Krejcik v N.N. (occasion unknown). In C.N. 2152 Richard Forster (Winterthur, Switzerland) added an analytical note concerning the former game.

Page 82 of Chess Explorations reproduced from C.N. 1848 a draw between Marshall and Janowsky played at 20 seconds per move in New York in 1918.

A discussion of the ending to the game Charles Curt v Hermann Helms, Brooklyn, 1909 (played at ten seconds a move) appeared in C.N. 2717. See pages 58-59 of A Chess Omnibus.

In C.N. 2894 (see page 38 of Chess Facts and Fables) Eduardo Bauzá Mercére (New York, NY, USA) gave a loss by Efim Bogoljubow to Horst Leede played in New York in 1924 (ten seconds per move).

Familiar examples of speed chess include:

C.N. 73 gave a lightning game between Alekhine and Pirc played in Ljubljana in 1930, our source being page 120 of the Times Literary Supplement, 12 February 1931. See also page 386 of the Skinner/Verhoeven volume on Alekhine.

Neil Brennen (Norristown, PA, USA) supplies the game below. Although it ends with a blunder, it is of some historical interest because few of Capablanca’s lightning games have survived.

Abraham Kupchik – José Raúl Capablanca
New York, 7 December 1918 (?)
Caro-Kann Defence

1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Nf6 5 Nxf6+ exf6 6 Nf3 Bd6 7 Bd3 O-O 8 O-O Nd7 9 c3 Re8 10 Qc2 Nf8 11 Bf5 Qc7 12 Be3 g6 13 Bxc8 Raxc8 14 Rfe1 Nd7 15 Re2 f5 16 Rae1 Nf6 17 Bc1 Rxe2 18 Rxe2 Qa5 19 a3 b5 20 Ne5 c5 21 Qd3 Ne4 22 Bh6 cxd4 23 f3 Bxe5 24 fxe4 dxc3 25 bxc3 Rxc3 26 Qd5 Qb6+ 27 Kf1 Qe6 28 Qd8+ Resigns.

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer, 29 June 1919.

The newspaper records that the time-limit was unusual: ‘five seconds for the first ten moves and ten seconds a move thereafter’. Although it was stated that the game ‘was played recently’ we believe that it was the loss referred to on page 28 of the January 1919 American Chess Bulletin. The tournament, held at the Manhattan Chess Club, was won by Janowsky, with Capablanca and Kupchik equal second. In a rapid transit tournament in October 1918 Janowsky had also finished ahead of the Cuban, whom he beat in their individual game (American Chess Bulletin, December 1918, page 254).


In an item reproduced on page 61 of Kings, Commoners and Knaves we gave, courtesy of Jack O’Keefe (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), a ten-seconds-per-move game between M.A. Shapiro and Capablanca played in New York on 11 March 1924. We first published Mr O’Keefe’s discovery on pages 26-27 of the Winter 1990 issue of Kingpin and placed it on-line in C.N. 6535. Previously, only two specimens of rapid transit chess by the Cuban were known (games against Meyer and Rosenthal). See page 100 of The Unknown Capablanca by David Hooper and Dale Brandreth (London, 1975).

Pages 119-121 of Capablanca in the United Kingdom (1911-1920) by V. Fiala (Olomouc, 2006) gave the scores of four lightning games won by Capablanca in Hastings in 1919, against R. Michell, B. Kostić, P. Flowers and E. Jesty.

The following game was played at ten seconds per move:

William Albert Fairhurst – Edmund Spencer
Southport, 16 August 1924
Ruy López

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 Nf6 4 O-O Nxe4 5 d4 Be7 6 Qe2 Nd6 7 Bxc6 bxc6 8 dxe5 Nb7 9 Nc3 O-O 10 Re1 Nc5 11 Nd4 Re8 12 Nf5 Bf8 13 Qg4 Kh8 14 Bg5 f6 15 exf6 Rxe1+ 16 Rxe1 gxf6


17 Re8 Resigns.

Sources: BCM, September 1924, page 356 and the Chess Amateur, February 1925, page 129.

The game was played in an informal lightning tournament won by Fairhurst, shortly before his 21st birthday. Among the other competitors were Morrison, Rubinstein and Yates.

Half a century later Fairhurst was still going strong, playing top board for New Zealand at the Nice Olympiad.


In the game below a move had to be made every ten seconds:

H. Laboschin – N.N.
Berlin, 1912
Giuoco Piano

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Bc5 4 c3 Nf6 5 d4 exd4 6 cxd4 Bb4+ 7 Nc3 Nxe4 8 O-O Nxc3 9 Re1+ Ne4 10 Rxe4+ Be7 11 d5 Nb8


12 d6 cxd6 13 Qxd6 b6 14 Bxf7+ Kxf7 15 Ng5+ Bxg5 16 Bxg5 Qxg5 17 Rf4+ Ke8 18 Re1+ Kd8 19 Rc1 Qg6 20 Rf8+ Rxf8 21 Qxf8+ Qe8 22 Rxc8+ Resigns.

Source: Deutsche Schachzeitung, July 1912, page 209.


A comment by B.H. Wood on page 19 of CHESS, November 1944:

‘Najdorf is a born chess genius and, with a little of the self-discipline which he so strikingly lacks, capable of winning any world championship. At lightning chess he scintillates; we once saw him beat Tartakower (who is quite a doughty exponent of this game himself) 14 times in succession at “five-minute” play. This could not be a normal result, but it illustrates the extraordinary swing of his temperament.’


From page 15 of the January 1934 American Chess Bulletin:

‘Having returned home during the Christmas holidays, José R. Capablanca is still in Havana, where, happily, political conditions are returning to normal. Before leaving New York he visited the Marshall Chess Club and, quite informally, took part in one of its weekly rapid transit tournaments. Winning nine games straight, the famous Cuban carried off the first prize. Reuben Fine, club champion who has to his credit a long series of victories in these weekly bouts, scored 7-2 and divided the second, third and fourth prizes with Milton Hanauer and Samuel Reshevsky.’

Gene Gnandt (Houston, TX, USA) sends us the more detailed report on page 31 of the New York Times, 7 December 1933:


The newspaper gave the complete final standings of the tournament (played on 6 December 1933) as follows: Capablanca 9-0; Fine 7-2, Hanauer 7-2 and Reshevsky 7-2; Chernev 4-5; Hamermesh 4-5; Dunst 2-7, Hammer 2-7 and Simon 2-7; Sack 1-8.


For further information on Fine’s exploits, see Reuben Fine by Aidan Woodger (Jefferson, 2004) and Blindfold Chess by Eliot Hearst and John Knott (Jefferson, 2009).

Wanted: contemporary substantiation of a remark supposedly made by Lasker to Capablanca:

‘A week or so earlier [compared to 26 July 1914] these two masters had met in Berlin, where they played a rapid-transit match of ten games. Capablanca won 6½:3½, and afterwards Lasker is alleged to have said, “It is remarkable: you make no mistakes”.’

Source: The Unknown Capablanca by David Hooper and Dale Brandreth (London, 1975), page 168.

Irving Chernev gave the words as ‘It is remarkable; you never seem to make a mistake’ in Chess Review, April 1954 (inside front cover and page 125) and as ‘Young man, you play remarkable chess! You never make a mistake!’ on page 234 of Combinations The Heart of Chess (New York, 1960).


From page 251 of the June 1908 BCM, in the obituary of H.E. Bird:

‘He claimed to be the chess champion of the world at lightning speed – say, at 1,000 moves per hour.’

Can relevant citations be found in Bird’s writings?


Lilienthal never defeated Alekhine in a tournament but was successful against him in blitz play. Since confusion sometimes arises over the matter, we reproduce the account provided by Lilienthal on page 24 of his autobiographical work Életem, a sakk (Budapest, 1985):


Below is the German translation, from pages 19-20 of Schach war mein Leben (Thun, Frankfurt/Main, 1988):



Robert Desjarlais (Bronxville, NY, USA) enquires about the origins of Fischer’s reported statement that ‘blitz kills ideas’.

The best citation that we can currently offer is a second-hand one, on page 308 of the June 1970 Chess Life & Review. Dragoslav Andrić wrote: ‘while Fischer is known for his pronounced years-long aversion to blitz play, which, in his opinion, “kills your ideas”.’



When Reuben Fine won the 1944 US Lightning Championship (playing, at ten seconds per move, 22 games in a single day), he dropped only one point, in this game:

Julius Partos – Reuben Fine
New York, 25 June 1944
King’s Indian Defence

1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 Nf3 O-O 5 e4 d6 6 Bd3 Nbd7 7 O-O e5 8 dxe5 dxe5 9 Bc2 c6 10 Bg5 h6 11 Bh4 Qe7 12 Qe2 Nc5 13 Bg3 Nh5 14 Rad1 Ne6 15 Qd2 Nd4 16 Nxd4 exd4 17 Ne2 Rd8 18 Bd3 Be6 19 f4 Nxg3 20 Nxg3 Bg4 21 Rde1 Bd7 22 e5 Re8 23 Ne4 c5 24 Nd6 Reb8


25 f5 Bxe5 26 fxg6 Qxd6 27 Qxh6 Be6 28 gxf7+ Bxf7 29 Qh7+ Kf8 30 Qxf7 mate.

Source: Chess Review, June-July 1944, page 12.

Partos, who finished sixth in the tournament, also inflicted defeats on Kevitz and Denker, as well as drawing with Kashdan. See the coverage on pages 53-69 of The Year Book of the United States Chess Federation 1944 edited by Montgomery Major (Chicago, 1945). Page 58 commented regarding Partos v Fine:

‘Fine’s only loss; and seldom has the Champion been so completely outgeneraled.’


What exactly is known about the rapid transit event held on the occasion of the St Petersburg, 1914 tournament?

From page 158 of the July 1914 American Chess Bulletin:

‘Although the chief prize at St Petersburg eluded him by the narrowest of margins, José R. Capablanca, besides taking the second prize, did not come away empty-handed with regard to minor honors, which included the first Rothschild prize for brilliancy, first prize in a rapid transit tourney, in which Dr Lasker was also a participant, as well as a fine record in simultaneous exhibitions, of which he gave three. ...

In the rapid transit tourney Capablanca had the satisfaction of making a score of 5½ out of a possible 6 points, with Dr Lasker, Dr Tarrasch and Alekhine among the competitors. It is not the first time, however, that he has worsted the world’s champion in this style of chess.’


From page 29 of the November 1945 Chess Review:


A fast game of chess (but what were the exact conditions?) was given on page 168 of the August 1923 Wiener Schachzeitung:

bogoljubow tartakower

Efim Bogoljubow – Savielly Tartakower
Mährisch-Ostrau, 1923
Center Counter-Game

1 e4 d5 2 exd5 Nf6 3 Nc3 Nxd5 4 Nf3 Bg4 5 Bc4 e6 6 d4 c6 7 h3 Bh5 8 g4 Bg6 9 Ne5 Bd6 10 Qf3 Bxe5 11 dxe5 Nd7 12 Bf4 Qa5 13 Bxd5 cxd5 14 O-O-O Rc8 15 h4


15...Qa4 16 Rd2 Rxc3 17 Qxc3 O-O 18 h5 Be4 19 f3 Qxa2 20 Rdh2 d4 21 Qa3 Qxa3 22 bxa3 Bxf3 23 Rg1 Rc8 24 h6 Rc3 25 Rd2 Nc5 26 Kb1 d3 27 cxd3 Nxd3 28 Rg3 Rc1+ 29 Ka2 Bd5 mate.


Kevin Harrison (Hunters Hill, NSW, Australia) asks about the authenticity of the Danish Gambit miniature H.E. Bird v Emanuel Lasker, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1892: 1 e4 e5 2 d4 exd4 3 c3 dxc3 4 Bc4 cxb2 5 Bxb2 Qg5 6 Nf3 Qxg2 7 Rg1 Bb4+ 8 Ke2 Qh3 9 Bxf7+ Kd8 10 Bxg7 Ne7 11 Ng5 Qh4 12 Ne6 mate.


We have no reason to doubt it. The game was published on page 48 of the October 1892 issue of N.T. Miniati’s Chess Review:

bird lasker


A victory by Julius du Mont against Richard Réti at ten seconds a move (London, 1922) was published on page 664 of 500 Master Games of Chess by S. Tartakower and J. du Mont (London, 1952).

‘A typical, sparkling, ten-second contest replete with hair-raising escapes, astonishing sacrifices, counter-sacrifices, furious assaults on both kings and amusing, child-like blunders.’

That was Santasiere’s description of a game which he won in a rapid-transit tournament at the Marshall Chess Club:

Anthony Edward Santasiere – Shedlovsky
New York, 1926
Center Counter-Game

1 e4 d5 2 exd5 Qxd5 3 Nc3 Qa5 4 b4 Qxb4 5 Rb1 Qd6 6 Nf3 a6 7 Bc4 e6 8 d4 Nf6 9 O-O b5 10 Bd3 Bb7 11 Qe2 c5 12 dxc5 Qxc5 13 Nxb5 axb5 14 Rxb5 Qc7 15 Nd4 Bd6


16 Nxe6 fxe6 17 Qxe6+ Kf8 18 Bh6 Bxh2+ 19 Kh1 Bxg2+ 20 Kxg2 Be5 21 Rxe5 Ra6 22 Qf5 Kf7 23 Bxa6 gxh6 24 Bd3 Rg8+ 25 Kh3 Nbd7 26 Re3 Rg5 27 Qf3 Rh5+


28 Qxh5+ Nxh5 29 Rf3+ Ndf6 30 Bxh7 Nf4+ 31 Kh4 Qe5 32 Rb1 Qh5+ 33 Kg3 Ne4+ 34 Kxf4 Resigns.

The score has been supplied by Eduardo Bauzá Mercére, from page 4A of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 23 September 1926:


A basic computer-check suggests many improvements to Santasiere’s annotations.


Noting the remark by Capablanca cited in C.N. 7557 (‘were it not for the fact that I have beaten Lasker at rapid chess, he would be considered the foremost rapid chessplayer in the world’), Jonathan Berry (Nanaimo, BC, Canada) writes:

‘I regret the passing of the label “Allegro” in reference to games with a time-control of about 30 minutes. It was in minor usage, persisted in Scotland, but eventually disappeared behind what I regard as inferior (either less descriptive or more ambiguous) labels: “Active”, “Action” and “Rapid”.’

In C.N. 1692 Stewart Reuben (Twickenham, England) gave definitions of about ten names used to describe fast chess, including ‘Allegro (Scotland)’.


Old specimens of fast chess are fairly scarce. Below are three from a tournament held at Marshall’s Chess Divan, New York on 28 April 1917. The time-limit was 20 seconds per move, and Marshall won the event with 5½ points, ahead of Janowsky (5), Chajes (4½), Jaffe (4), Bernstein (3), Hodges (3), Black (2½) and Beynon (½).

Dawid Janowsky – Jacob Bernstein
New York, 28 April 1917
Four Knights’ Game

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bb5 Bb4 5 O-O O-O 6 d3 d6 7 Bg5 Bxc3 8 bxc3 Qe7 9 Re1 Nd8 10 d4 Ne6 11 Bc1 Rd8 12 Rb1 c5 13 Bc4 b6 14 d5 Nf8 15 h3 Rb8 16 Bd3 a6 17 c4 Bd7 18 Nh2 Ng6 19 Ng4 Nxg4 20 hxg4 b5 21 g3 bxc4 22 Rxb8 Rxb8 23 Bxc4 Bb5 24 Bd3 Bxd3 25 Qxd3 Qb7 26 Bd2 Qb5 27 Qa3 f6 28 Kg2 Nf8


29 g5 Nd7 30 Qf3 fxg5 31 Bxg5 Rf8 32 Qg4 Qb4 33 Re3 Nf6 34 Qe6+ Rf7 35 Bxf6 gxf6 36 Qxd6 a5 37 Qe6 Qc4 38 Qc8+ Rf8 39 Qg4+ Kf7 40 Rb3 Qa6 41 Qd7+ Kg6 42 Rb7 Resigns.

Jacob Bernstein – Frank James Marshall
New York, 28 April 1917
Queen’s Gambit Declined

1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 c5 4 cxd5 exd5 5 Nf3 Nc6 6 e3 Nf6 7 Be2 Bd6 8 O-O O-O 9 b3 Bg4 10 Bb2 cxd4 11 exd4 Rc8 12 Rc1 Bf4 13 Rb1 Re8 14 h3 Bh5 15 Nh2 Bg6 16 Bd3 Qd6 17 Nf3 Ne4 18 Nb5 Qf6 19 Bxe4 Bxe4 20 Ra1 Bb8 21 Re1 Qf4 22 Ne5 Nxe5 23 dxe5 Qg5 24 f3


24...Rc2 25 Re2 Rxb2 26 fxe4 Rxe2 27 Qxe2 Qxe5 28 Rd1 a6 29 Nd4 Ba7 30 Qd2 dxe4 31 Kh1 Rd8 32 Nc6 Rxd2 33 Rxd2 Qa1+ 34 White resigns.

Charles Jaffe – Roy Turnbull Black
New York, 28 April 1917
Queen’s Pawn Game

1 d4 Nf6 2 Nf3 c6 3 e3 d6 4 Nc3 Bg4 5 Be2 Nbd7 6 e4 e5 7 O-O Be7 8 Be3 O-O 9 Nh4 Bxe2 10 Qxe2 Nxe4 11 Nxe4 Bxh4 12 Nxd6 exd4 13 Bxd4 Qc7 14 Nf5 Bf6 15 Rad1 Qf4 16 Ne7+ Kh8 17 Be3 Qc7 18 Nf5 Bxb2 19 Qg4 Rad8 20 Rd4 g6 21 Bh6 Bxd4 22 Qxd4+ Qe5


23 Bg7+ Resigns.

Source: American Chess Bulletin, May-June 1917, pages 110-113.


On page 627 of Vabanque Dawid Janowsky 1868-1927 by Daniel Ackermann (Ludwigshafen, 2005) the Janowsky v Bernstein was given, with Black misidentified as S.N. Bernstein.

For the game Kostić v Keres, Stockholm, 1937 (blitz tournament), see page 74 of Kings, Commoners and Knaves.

Below is a game contributed by Eduardo Bauzá Mercére. It was played in a rapid transit tournament (ten seconds per move) mentioned on page 182 of the April 1905 American Chess Bulletin.

John Finan Barry – Edward Hymes
New York, 14 April 1905
King’s Pawn Opening

1 e4 d6 2 d4 f5 3 Bd3 fxe4 4 Bxe4 Nf6 5 Bd3 Nc6 6 c3 e5 7 dxe5 Nxe5 8 Bc2 Be7 9 Ne2 O-O 10 O-O Nfg4 11 Bb3+ Kh8 12 h3 Nf6 13 Be3 Bf5 14 Nf4 Qe8 15 Nd2 Bd3 16 Nxd3 Nxd3 17 Qc2 Ne5 18 Rae1 Qh5 19 f4 Ng6 20 Nf3 Nh4 21 Nxh4 Qxh4 22 Bxa7 Nh5 23 Be3 Ng3 24 Rf3 Nf5 25 Bf2 Qh6 26 g4 Nh4 27 Bxh4 Bxh4 28 Ref1 Rae8 29 Qg2 Bd8 30 f5 Qg5 31 Be6 Re7 32 Qe2 Qh4 33 Kg2 h5 34 Rg3 Kh7 35 Qe4 Rf6 36 Qe1 Kh8


37 g5 Rf8 38 Qe2 Kh7 39 Qe3 Kh8 40 Kh2 Kh7 41 Kg2 Kh8 42 Qd4 Qxd4 43 cxd4 g6 44 d5 gxf5 45 Rgf3 Rg7 46 h4 Be7 47 Rxf5 Rxf5 48 Rxf5 Kh7 49 Kf3 Kg6 50 Rf4 Kh7 51 Ke4 Kh8 52 a4 Kh7 53 b4 Kh8 54 a5 Kh7 55 b5 Kg6


56 a6 bxa6 57 bxa6 Bxg5 58 hxg5 Kxg5 59 a7 Resigns.

Source: Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 28 May 1905, page 9.


Eduardo Bauzá Mercére has sent the following from the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 15 July 1915, page 3:


E. Henry Koehler – Jacob Carl Rosenthal
New York, 1915
Four Knights’ Game

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bb5 Bb4 5 O-O d6 6 Nd5 Bc5 7 d4 exd4 8 Nxd4 Bd7 9 Nf5 O-O 10 Bg5 Ne5 11 Nxf6+ gxf6 12 Bxd7 fxg5 13 Bb5 Kh8 14 Kh1 g4 15 f4 gxf3 16 gxf3 Qf6 17 f4 Ng6 18 Qh5 Qxb2 19 Rab1 Qxc2 20 Rbe1 c6 21 Rf3 Rg8 22 Qxh7+ Kxh7 23 Rh3+ Nh4 24 Rxh4+ Kg6 25 Rh6 mate.

Dan Scoones (Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada) forwards a neglected game for which each player had only five minutes:

Mikhail Tal – Boris Spassky
Rapid championship of Moscow, 1957
Ruy López

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 f5 4 Nc3 Nd4 5 exf5 Nf6 6 Nxe5 Bc5 7 0–0 0–0 8 Nf3 c6 9 Nxd4 Bxd4 10 Ne2 Be5 11 Bc4+ d5 12 Bd3 c5 13 Ng3 c4 14 Be2 Bxg3 15 hxg3 Bxf5 16 d3 b5 17 a4 a6 18 axb5 axb5 19 Rxa8 Qxa8 20 dxc4 dxc4 21 Bf3


21...Qa2 22 Re1 Qb1 23 Qd6 Qxc2 24 Bd5+ Nxd5 25 Qxd5+ Kh8


26 Qf7 Rg8 27 Bh6 and White won.

Source: Chess Life, February 1963, page 38.

The game appeared in an article by Eliot Hearst which reported that the moves had been recorded by B. Weinstein. It was also noted that the same opening had occurred in the game between Tal and Spassky in the USSR championship earlier in 1957.

At move 15 Hearst commented: ‘For the last five moves the two players had consumed two minutes, a considerable time; for the next six moves they used some ten seconds only.’ Spassky spent some time on 21...Qa2, and ‘Tal also thought a while on his reply and prepared a pretty and decisive trap’.


Game 93 in One Hundred and Seventy Five Chess Brilliancies by P. Wenman (London, 1947) is a ten-move victory by the author (Bristol, 1939) played at ten seconds per move in which he gave the odds of his queen’s rook and queen’s knight.

From page 285 of Chess World, 1 December 1948, in a column written by M.E. Goldstein:


1 f4 e5 2 fxe5 d6 3 exd6 Bxd6 4 Nf3 g5 5 d4 g4 6 Ng5 f5 7 e4 Be7 8 Nh3 gxh3 9 Qh5+ Kf8 10 Bc4 Qe8 11 Qh6+ Nxh6 12 Bxh6 mate.

On page 62 of Irving Chernev’s 1000 Best Short Games of Chess (New York, 1955) White was identified as ‘Eliascheff’.


‘Chess is the most creative, fascinating and challenging game there is; and the most exciting spine-tingling form of chess is Blitz.’

Source: Walter Browne on page 1 of the first issue (May-June 1988) of his magazine Blitz Chess.



Latest update: 11 June 2016.

To the Chess Notes main page.

To the Archives for other feature articles.

Copyright: Edward Winter. All rights reserved.