6495.
Banks on Marshall
Page 7 of Banks’ Blindfold Checker
Masterpieces by Newell W. Banks (Philadelphia, 1947) quoted his
view of F.J. Marshall:
‘I received more good ideas on
opening and mid-game chess play from my old friend Frank Marshall
than from all the other chessplayers I have known. If Marshall had
had the urge to continue to apply himself to study and analysis he
could have been at the top all his life. He was the greatest natural
player of them all.’
6496. Quiz question (C.N. 6424)
A last call for proposals concerning the question
posed in C.N. 6424: what was the largest number of opponents ever
faced by Morphy in a simultaneous exhibition?
6497. Signatures
For readers who enjoy identifying
signatures, we give another illustration from our collection (the
1982 Dover edition of Chernev’s book on Capablanca):
6498.
G. Levenfish
Javier Asturiano Molina (Murcia,
Spain) asks about the correct spelling of
Levenfish/Löwenfisch.
Both are commonly seen, with a distinct
trend nowadays towards the former in many countries. The German
rendition ‘Löwenfisch’ or ‘Loewenfisch’ was particularly
common in English-language literature in the first half of the
twentieth century, although the BCM sometimes had
‘Lövenfisch’. The 1971 volume Dizionario
Enciclopedico degli Scacchi used ‘Levenfisch’. The last two
spellings mentioned may be regarded as non-standard.
The above photograph was published in Chess Review,
April
1947, page
9.
6499. Claim about Janowsky
From an article ‘Tall Tales
of Teetotalers’ by H. Kmoch and F. Reinfeld on pages 136-137 of the
May 1952 Chess Review:
‘He considered himself the strongest
player of all time ...’
What are the grounds for asserting
that such was Janowsky’s belief?
6500.
Che Guevara (C.N.s 4803, 4809 & 4934)
David
Jarrett (Athens) sends three photographs which he acquired some years
ago. Readers’ assistance with identifying other figures (in addition to
Gligorić
and Smyslov) will be appreciated.
6501. James H. Taft (C.N.s 64 &
5170)
John Blackstone (Las Vegas, NV, USA)
draws attention to page 3 of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle of 20
July 1916, which had some information about J.H. Taft, including his
birth-date: 3 March 1888.
In the game
given, 11 Ng5 was described as ‘an important and promising
departure from the books’.
James H. Taft – Frank Kendall Perkins
New York, 1916
Queen’s Gambit Declined
1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 c5 4 cxd5 exd5 5
Nf3 Nc6 6 g3 Nf6 7 Bg2 Be7 8 O-O Ne4 9 dxc5 Nxc3 10 bxc3 Bxc5
11 Ng5
h6 12 Nxf7 Kxf7 13 Bxd5+ Ke8 14 e4 Qf6 15 Qh5+ g6 16 Bxc6+ bxc6 17
Qxc5 Bh3 18 Rd1
18...Qf3 19 Qxc6+ Kf7 20 Qd5+ Kg7 21 e5 Qxd5 22 Rxd5 Rhd8
23 Rxd8 Rxd8 24 Be3 a6 25 Re1 h5 26 Bd4 Resigns.
The game was played in a short match at
the Brooklyn Chess Club (won by Taft +1 –0 =3) which was also
mentioned on page 223 of the November 1916 American Chess
Bulletin.
Our correspondent provides too a match-game from page 3 of the
Brooklyn
Daily Eagle, 27 July
1916:
James H. Taft – Alvin Cushing Cass
New York, 25 July 1916
Queen’s Gambit Declined
1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 e3 Nf6 4 Nc3 g6 5 Bd3
Bg7 6 Nf3 Nbd7 7 O-O O-O 8 e4 dxc4 9 Bxc4 Nb6 10 Be2 Be6 11 Ng5 Qd7
12 Be3 Rfd8 13 Nxe6 Qxe6 14 Qc2 Rd7 15 Rad1 Rad8 16 h3 h5 17 e5 Nfd5
18 Ne4 Nxe3 19 fxe3 Bh6 20 Nc5 Bxe3+ 21 Kh1 Qxa2 22 Nxd7 Rxd7
23 d5
Nxd5 24 e6 Rd6 25 exf7+ Kf8 26 Ra1 Nb4 27 Qc3 Bd4 28 Qxb4 Qe6 29 Qxb7
Rd8 30 Rae1 Qd6 31 Bf3 Bb6 32 Qxc6 Qb4 33 Rd1 Rb8 34 Qe8+ Resigns.
6502.
‘The poetry of chess’ (C.N.s 5223, 5290 & 5347)
In
the second half of the nineteenth century, problems were sometimes
referred to as ‘the poetry of chess’, but who coined the
description?
The
earliest citation that we can offer is on page 271 of Daniel W.
Fiske’s book on New York, 1857:
‘Problem-making
has been very properly denominated the poetry of chess. The same
depth of imagination, the same fecundity of invention, the same quick
perception of the beautiful, which characterize the poet, belong also
to the chess strategist.’
6503.
Masters’ reports on simultaneous displays (C.N.s 6198 & 6333)
Michael
Clapham (Ipswich, England) quotes from a posthumous article
‘Simultaneous Displays from the Inside’ by B.H. Wood on pages
36-37 of the December 1991 CHESS:
‘Curiously,
I cannot recall, in the whole of chess literature, any article by the
soloist himself in simultaneous displays.’
6504.
Soultanbéieff (C.N. 6486)
Stéphane
Pilawski (Liège, Belgium) reports that he has a copy of
Soultanbéieff’s Guide
pratique du Jeu des Combinaisons
inscribed to Louis Malpas:
From
pages 47-49 of the book we give the score of ‘une
partie extraordinairement intéressante et mouvementée’ (Znosko-Borovsky):
Victor
Soultanbéieff – M. Kreimer
Liège
(summer tournament), 1928
French Defence
1
d4 e6 2 e4 d5 3 Nc3 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Nf6 5 Bg5 Be7 6 Bxf6 gxf6 7 Nf3 Rg8 8
Qd2 Nc6 9 Qh6 Rg6 10 Qxh7 Qd5 11 Qh8+ Kd7 12 Nc5+ Bxc5 13 dxc5 Qe4+
14 Be2 Ke7
15 O-O-O Qxe2 16 Nd4 Nxd4 17 Rxd4 e5 18 Rd8
18...Qxc2+ 19 Kxc2
Bf5+ 20 Kc1 Rxd8 21 Qh5 Rg5 22 Qf3 Rd3 23 Qxb7 Rg4 24 Qa6 Rgd4
25 g4
Bg6 26 f4 Rxf4 27 Rd1 Rxd1+ 28 Kxd1 Rd4+ 29 Ke2 Rxg4 30 Qxa7 Kd7 31
Qb7 Be4 32 Qb3 Ke7 33 h3 Rg2+ 34 Kf1 f5 35 Qb4 Bc6 36 Qh4+ f6 37 Qh7+
Ke6 38 Qxc7 Bf3 39 Qc8+ Kf7 40 Qxf5 Bc6 41 Qc8 Be4 42 c6 Rxb2 43 Qd7+
Kg6 44 Qg4+ Resigns.
Soultanbéieff
also annotated the game on pages 1012-1013 of L’Echiquier,
September 1928.
6505. Adolf Schwarz on Steinitz (C.N. 4375)
W. Steinitz. Source: Chess
Monthly,
March 1891, page 193
‘This
little man has taught
us all how to play
chess’ is a famous remark about Steinitz by Adolf Schwarz, as
discussed in C.N. 4375. Here we add a nineteenth-century citation,
from page 165 of the August 1897 American Chess Magazine:
‘The
chess world owes a debt of gratitude to the past-master, and here is
an opportunity to partly repay it. At the Vienna tournament of 1882
the noted chess master Adolph Schwartz [sic],
pointing to Steinitz, said, “This little man has taught us all to
play chess”, and no truer word was ever spoken. He is the father of
modern play, and Lasker, Pillsbury, Tarrasch, in fact all who rank
high in chess, willingly acknowledge in him their teacher.
Paraphrasing a well-known saying, one can stick a pin at random in
any handbook and one will find an innovation by Steinitz and adopted
since by the chess world. Moreover, he was the pioneer of scientific
annotation, and the best analysts of the day are his pupils.’
An alternative
version of the remark under discussion:
‘...
Dr Emanuel Lasker said, “This little man taught us all we know”.’
Source:
page 17 of Ray Keene’s Good Move Guide
by R. Keene and A. Whiteley (Oxford, 1982).
6506. Wilson and Labourdonnais
From Rod Edwards (Victoria, BC,
Canada):
‘On page 112 of his book Chess
& Chess-Players (London, 1850) George Walker wrote:
“My friend, Harry
Wilson, once gave De la Bourdonnais the knight.”
Page 879 of A
History of Chess by H.J.R. Murray (Oxford, 1913) states:
“In 1815, Harry
Wilson, who was playing even with Lewis in 1819, had played with De
la Bourdonnais, giving him the odds of the knight.”
In that footnote Murray cites Deutsches
Wochenschach, 1912, pages 1-7, for a life of Labourdonnais
but does not make it clear whether his information about the
Frenchman’s play against Wilson is derived from that source. Where
does the information come from (Walker’s book does not
mention the year),
and is anything more known about games between the two players?’
The
article, by O. Koch, in Deutsches Wochenschach does not refer
to Wilson, but the year 1815 was given by George Walker a few years
before the appearance of his book Chess &
Chess-Players. In an article dated October 1843 about the
McDonnell v Labourdonnais games Walker wrote on page 371 of that year’s
Chess
Player’s Chronicle:
‘In 1815, my friend Harry Wilson gave
De la Bourdonnais, in Paris, the Knight in odds.’

Walker’s account was not disputed
by Wilson, whose familiarity with the Chronicle is shown by his
writing about other matters on pages 57-58
and 146-150 of the 1844 volume.
An obituary of Wilson was published on
page 57 of the Chronicle in 1851:
We also note the follow item about
‘Philidor’s Chess Board’ on page 108 of the Chess World,
1867:

The present item ends with a specimen of Harry Wilson’s play:
Piercy – Harry Wilson
Occasion? (circa 1844)
Sicilian Defence
1 e4 c5 2 c3 Nc6 3 Nf3 e6 4 d4 d5 5 e5 Nge7 6 Bb5 Qb6 7 a4 Bd7
8 Bxc6 Nxc6 9 O-O c4 10 Qe2 Be7 11 Bf4 Na5 12 Na3 Nb3 13 Ra2 Qa6 14 Nd2
Nxd2 15 Qxd2 Bxa4 16 Nc2 Qc6 17 Rfa1 b5 18 Nb4 Bxb4 19 cxb4 O-O 20 Ra3
a5 21 Rg3 Ra7 22 Rc1 f5 23 b3
23...axb4 24 bxa4 c3 25 Qe2 bxa4 26 Qh5 a3 27
Bh6 Rff7 28 Qg5 Qc8 29 Qe3 a2 30 Qe1 f4 31 Rg4 b3 32 Bxf4
32...b2 33 Rxc3
Qxc3 34 Qxc3 a1(Q)+ 35 White resigns.
Source: Chess Player’s Chronicle, 1844, pages 202-203,
where White is referred to as ‘Mr Piercy, of the Military College,
Sandhurst’. No forename was supplied, but page 44 of the February 1884 BCM
mentioned John Piercy, a deceased professor at Sandhurst.
6507. Alekhine at Prague, 1931
Jan Kalendovský (Brno, Czech
Republic) sends two photographs of Alekhine at the 1931 Olympiad in
Prague:
We note that a cropped version of the
first photograph was published on page 153 of the September-October
1931 American Chess Bulletin:
6508. Blackburne v Gunsberg
Three years before playing Steinitz for
the world championship, Gunsberg lost a match-game in 11 moves:
Joseph Henry Blackburne – Isidor
Arthur Gunsberg
Eighth match-game, Bradford, 6 October
1887
Ruy López
1
e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 Nf6 4 Qe2 a6 5 Ba4 Bc5 6 c3 b5 7 Bc2 d5 8 exd5
Qxd5 9 d4 Bd6 10 Bb3 Qe4 11 Qxe4 Resigns.
Sources: BCM, November 1887,
pages 429-430 (which included the players’ brief notes) and Chess
Monthly, December 1887, pages 112-113.
There are databases which have the move order as 3...a6 4 Ba4
Nf6 5
Qe2 Bc5 and, even, are
wrong about the occasion of the game (e.g. giving the date as 1890).
Chess Notes Archives
Factfinder
Copyright: Edward Winter. All rights
reserved.
|